Review of the Honda XR 650 (XR650L, XR650R) motorcycle

XR 650

- Honda motorcycle model

The Honda XR650L enduro motorcycle model appeared in 1993 on the North American market. The model belonged to the class of so-called “soft-enduro” - off-road civilian motorcycles adapted for use on public roads. The motorcycle became a follower of the Honda XR600, inheriting the air-cooled engine from the Honda NX650 Dominator model and receiving fairly simple equipment - a steel frame, simple suspension, 5-speed gearbox and electric starter.

In 2000, Honda expanded the series by offering the market a new modification - the Honda XR650R. This model could not be used on public roads; it did not have an electric starter, battery, lighting equipment (in particular, direction indicators), mirrors and license plate mounts. However, the model received a number of technical differences:

Aluminum frame.

New liquid-cooled engine (50% more powerful).

Kayaba suspension (thicker fork, different settings, additional adjustments).

Off-road wheels.

Other gearbox settings.

Another carburetor (flat throttle instead of vacuum).

Lighter weight (142 kg curb weight versus 157 kg for the XR650L).

The sports modification of the Honda XR650R was available until 2007 inclusive and was sold not only in North America, but also in the markets of Europe and Australia.

As of 2021, the Honda XR650L is still in production and available in the North American market.

Brief history of the model

1993 - start of production and sales of the Honda XR650L model. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Frame number: JH2RD06X*PM. Factory designation: XR650LP

1994 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Frame number: JH2RD06X*RM. Factory designation: XR650LR

1995 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Frame number: JH2RD06X*SM. Factory designation: XR650LS

1996 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Frame number: JH2RD06X*TM. Factory designation: XR650LT

1997 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Frame number: JH2RD06X*VM. Factory designation: XR650LV

1998 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Frame number: JH2RD06X*WM. Factory designation: XR650LW

1999 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Frame number: JH2RD06X*XK. Factory designation: XR650LX

2000 - appearance of the Honda XR650R modification. Model: Honda XR650L; Honda XR650R (North America, Europe, Australia). Factory designation: XR650LY; XR650RY.

2001 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L; Honda XR650R (North America, Europe, Australia). Factory designation: XR650L1; XR650R1.

2002 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L; Honda XR650R (North America, Europe, Australia). Factory designation: XR650L2; XR650R2.

2003 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L; Honda XR650R (North America, Europe, Australia). Factory designation: XR650L3; XR650R3.

2004 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L; Honda XR650R (North America, Europe, Australia). Factory designation: XR650L4; XR650R4.

2005 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L; Honda XR650R (North America, Europe, Australia). Factory designation: XR650L5; XR650R5.

2006 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L; Honda XR650R (North America, Europe, Australia). Factory designation: XR650L6; XR650R6.

2007 is the last year of production of the Honda XR650R modification. Model: Honda XR650L; Honda XR650R (North America, Europe, Australia). Factory designation: XR650L7; XR650R7.

2008 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Frame number: JH2RD06X*8K6. Factory designation: XR650L8.

2009 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Frame number: JH2RD06X*9K7. Factory designation: XR650L9.

2010 - model not produced. 2011 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Factory designation: XR650LB.

2012 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Factory designation: XR650LC.

2013 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Factory designation: XR650LD.

2014 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Factory designation: XR650LE.

2015 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Factory designation: XR650LF.

2016 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Factory designation: XR650LG.

2017 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Factory designation: XR650LH.

2018 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Factory designation: XR650LJ.

2019 - no significant changes. Model: Honda XR650L (North America). Factory designation: XR650LK.

Characteristics:

Specifications of Honda XR 650 (XR650L, XR650R):

ModelHonda XR650 (XR650L, XR650R)
Motorcycle typeenduro
Year of issue1993+
Framesteel half-duplex – XR650L
aluminum half-duplex – XR650R
engine's type1-cylinder, 4-stroke
Working volume644.0 cm³ – XR650L
649.0 cm³ – XR650R
Bore/Stroke100.0 x 82.0 mm – XR650L
100.0 x 82.6 mm – XR650R
Compression ratio8.3:1 – XR650L
10.0:1 – XR650R
Coolingair – XR650L
liquid – XR650R
Number of valves per cylinderSOHC, 4 valves
Fuel supply systemCarburetor, 1x 42.5 mm (CV) – XR650L
Carburetor, 1x 42.0 mm (flat choke) – XR650R
Ignition typeCDI
Maximum power41.5 hp
(30.5 kW) at 6000 rpm – XR650L 61.2 hp (45.0 kW) at 6750 rpm – XR650R
Maximum torque51.0 Nm (5.2 kg*m) at 5000 rpm - XR650L
64.0 Nm (6.5 kg*m) at 5500 rpm - XR650R
ClutchMulti-disc in oil bath, cable drive
Transmission5-speed
type of drivechain
Front tire size3.00-21 51S – XR650L
3.00-21 51P – XR650R
Rear tire size4.60-18 63S – XR650L
4.50-18 70P – XR650R
Front brakes1 disc, 240 mm, 2-piston caliper
Rear brakes1 disc, 240 mm, 1-piston caliper
Front suspensionShowa 43mm pneumatic telescopic fork (compression adjustable), 295mm travel – XR650L
Kayaba 46mm telescopic fork (compression and rebound adjustable), 285mm travel – XR650R
Rear suspensionPro-link swingarm with Showa monoshock (fully adjustable), 280 mm travel – XR650L
Pro-link swingarm with Kayaba monoshock (fully adjustable), 307 mm travel – XR650R
Motorcycle length2185 mm – XR650L
2255 mm – XR650R
Motorcycle width855 mm – XR650L
825 mm – XR650R
Motorcycle height1245 mm
Wheelbase1455 mm – XR650L
1485 mm – XR650R (ED, DK types)

1490 mm – XR650R (U type)

Seat height950 mm – XR650L
939 mm – XR650R
Minimum ground clearance (clearance)330 mm – XR650L
305 mm – XR650R
Acceleration 0-100 km/h (0-60 mph)5.83 sec[1]
Maximum speed158 km/h[2]
Gas tank capacity10.5 l (including reserve - 2.3 l) - XR650L
10.0 l (including reserve - 4.5 l) - XR650R
Motorcycle weight (curb)157 kg – XR650L
142 kg – XR650R (ED, DK types)

144 kg – XR650R (U type)

Review of the Honda XR 650 (XR650L, XR650R) motorcycle

Honda XR650R. After 3 years of piloting a Honda CBR 1100 XX, it’s unclear what and why the hell pulled me to sell the blackbird and switch to a 2003 SUZUKI DRZ 400S for a long time. In the winter of 2009, it was taken out of the garage from a supposedly guarded parking lot. In those days, I wanted to tin a glass, but my health failed me. Having recovered from such a blow of fate, having borrowed money, I bought a HONDA XR 650R 2004 at the Soyuzmoto motorcycle dealership. About the motorcycle dealership of the worst I can’t find words - it’s a sodomy office. Having picked up the moto from the motorcycle dealership at Kashira, I drove it home to the hut in Strogono along the Moscow Ring Road. It was pouring rain. I got wet like a beast, moreover, the moto stalled halfway there. I couldn’t start it from the kick with the pusher( alone) too. I caught the chaise, they pushed me into the two of them, and the motor began to rattle. The next day I rushed to Chekushev’s motorcycle service center. Halfway along the ring, the motorcycle suddenly stalled. All attempts to start the engine were unsuccessful even with a kick. As it turned out later, the candle was stuck. I caught a Lada 11 model and for 1000 rubles the conversation became more substantive with the driver of the car. The subsequent mileage to the service I was shaking on a rope behind the Lada. The service center adjusted the valves and carburetor. The engine started up normally. Comparing the Suzuki DRZ 400S and HONDA XR 650R in terms of acceleration dynamics, Suza nervously smokes on the sidelines. The weak light of the headlights and the twitching of the kick bothered me and I sold it without regret and re-seated it back into the sport saddle.

I’ll also insert my 5 cents, because the XR650R itself is from 2001.

The motorcycle is specific, but I like it. I like the fact that when used skillfully, it is capable of much. And there are really no alternatives, sports enduras need to be regularly serviced (valves, piston, timing belt), with this I except changing the oil (although it is advisable to change it every 2 thousand, and not 6, as indicated in the manual), replacing bearings, wheel seals , I did nothing to edit or change the steering wheel. I don’t even know what kind of candle it is. True, I’m lying, there were problems - the spokes pulled out of the rear wheels, and the clutch ran out, but maybe I forced him a little. The 650 has a lot of tuning - you can install a dynojet, a big Boryu, some kind of clever carb and much more. I have forward flow and an enlarged jet. The tank again does not rust, it is plastic.

The weight is 10 kg more than that of the 250-current type XRR, TTR, Djebel due to the aluminum frame, plastic tank, lack of unnecessary parts in the form of a starter, again, the heavy silencer is almost all replaced with direct flow, in order to make it even lighter I removed it license plate mount, turn signals, passenger footrests, in principle it turned out not particularly heavier than the 250. The suspensions are of course rather weak, if you jump more than a meter, it goes almost all the way through, I’m thinking of installing the CRF shock absorber, try it, it’s much stiffer and the fork is upside down. Starting is annoying only for the first month, then you can start it with slates, but you are not dependent on the battery. I drove it 300 km off-road without any problems, never got tired, and in the first week after purchase I drove more than 1000 km.

Let me summarize

Pros - indestructible engine, good power, smooth torque, relatively low consumption for such volume and power, can be used for light riding, and for enduro competitions, for rallies and trophy raids, to jump a little on a cross-country track, for tourism, for supermoto (if you remake it, in my opinion this is the most redesignable motorcycle for supermoto)

The downsides are the suspension, but there is an opinion that they are poorly tuned for me, because before me there was a dwarf a little taller than Putin or Medvedev. Now I’ll finish the wad and pick out the pendants….

Take it, you won't go wrong. By the way, before the 650 I had holes, for some reason the suspension is better, but everything else is worse. The engine is broken (the generator, the clutch, the timing chain broke, the valves were not bent, the camshafts rubbed the head). It weighs the same, has one and a half times less power, costs almost the same, it makes no sense in one word.

Only sportenduras are better, but you will hesitate to service them...

Honda XR650R. I'm riding this motorcycle now. There are several modifications of it. The one for the American market has almost nothing electrical. There is no stop, only markers, turn signals, normal headlights. There's not even a key. This version is strangled. To ventilate, you need to change the jet, do some magic with the air vent and the muffler. Yes, this modification does not have part of the subframe under the rear wing. Versions for Australia and Japan are not strangled and have a full set of electrics for moving around extra.

The tank is enough for one and a half hundred km. There are several types of enlarged tanks for sale on eBay.

The motorcycle has a high seating position, so it is not suitable for people who are used to shuffling their feet, trying to go around a log. My height is 182. I reach the ground with part of both feet. You can install a lowering link in the suspension. It will be 4 cm lower.

As for driving, the moto is much more composed than the 250 ki. The weight, of course, will be felt in difficult areas, but when you get used to it, this parameter becomes not critical. The pendants are adjustable. There are plenty of them to move through fields and forests. There are enough brakes for off-road use, but almost to the point.

There are no problems with handling on asphalt. But the brakes are clearly not enough here. There are two solutions: engine braking and the installation of numerous tunings in the form of 280 or 320 mm brake discs and the list goes on.

To transport travel luggage, you need to build a subframe amplifier. And for lovers of long trips, several types of foam pads are sold to replace the standard one. They cost approx. 50 ue.

Problems with starting only arise if you do not know the appropriate algorithm. In general, it starts without problems when cold with 1-2 kicks. You don’t need to have any extraordinary power to do this.

Oil is poured approx. 2 liters and is changed every 1000 km along with the filter. Same interval for valve adjustment. There are no problems or difficulties with this action. Everything is convenient.

The moped is very popular in the states, so there are a lot of spare parts for it there in bulk.

In general, the moto brings a lot of pleasure and positivity) If you like it and have experience, then you can take it) But if this is your first enduro, then definitely refuse.

By the way, for 300 sput+ it makes sense to look at the new husqvarnas. They are lighter. There is an e-starter and a guarantee;)

Finally I drove it to the forest. I will describe the sensations in comparison with the jebel, because someone is looking in its direction as a replacement for the jebel. To begin with, I will describe my specifications. I’m 189 tall and weigh 75, when I eat a lot, but I’ve been involved in sports all my life, so I’m damn hardy and, as people say, wiry. Around town the xr650r is a song. I can’t compare the feeling from the moment with anything, except perhaps the Kawasaki z1000 , but this is the only liter that I drove. The phaser, ruff and v-storm feel weak and do not work subjectively. In terms of maneuverability, they are the same, the jab feels lighter, and generally like a bicycle.

Now the most interesting part is the forest. As you understand, the forest is not his element, and everyone scared me. But what was my surprise that even on oak, worn-out tires it rides well. Yes, his rear wheel constantly breaks off when skidding, but in a stance it is not difficult to control, and when accelerating, he evens out the movement. On the second one, it also wears its ass off when opening the gas, but here the tires are still crappy and the ground is all soggy. So keeping the trajectory and straightening out if something happens is much easier than a jebel. I always drove in idle mode or opening the throttle to 1/6, but then the satellites made their own adjustments. Riding in a stance is very comfortable, more comfortable than riding a jab. It’s simply impossible to ride it while sitting with your legs twisted, the moto immediately turns around and starts to wear terribly.

I also rode on small logs, everything was within normal limits, I was afraid to attack large ones. Regarding the ravines, this is a song, I drive off at idle in the rear pillar, give the gas up to 2000 rpm and roll up to the top, loading the front end, but the ravines were dry. I tried to drive through a ravine with wet soil, but because I was riding sitting and kicking my legs, I ended up getting stuck. I also drove through sand next to a river, when the motorcycle gets buried on a third of the wheel, it rides normally, but you have to work carefully with the gas. I also stopped at the second stick (cm 7 stick) with my rear wheel, but then I couldn’t move, so it quickly dug up.

About the kick. I started it specifically on a slope and didn’t experience any problems. In the end, I just got tired and problems started with the plant, but this is still due to lack of skill and a rubber attachment is needed on the kick, since after the forest the motorboat slips off. Look like that's it.

Honda XR650L. I bought my horse in March 2009. At the moment, I have driven about 11 thousand kilometers on it per season, of which three thousand in the winter. Compared to Doubel, and even to other endurike chekushkas, the motorcycle is a little larger in size - wider, higher on the saddle and a little longer. Due to the greater weight and longer wheelbase, the XR650L is noticeably more stable and stable on various sections of roads; when driving on asphalt roads, comfortable (cruising) speed is limited more by the wind pressure, and not by the capabilities of the engine - therefore, some kind of windbreaker is more than appropriate. The motorcycle has a completely different character of the engine - it is noticeably more powerful than the Dyubelevsky, and its character is completely different - a tractor, with powerful traction from the very bottom, if you first shift the gears up with a short squeeze of the clutch without releasing the gas, as I did out of habit on the Dyubel - the motorcycle “fired” “Jump forward at a level from under the rider, and when starting from traffic lights, when out of habit I turned off the gas, the motorcycle often raised the wheel to the sky.

At first, in city driving mode, especially when maneuvering in heavy traffic, in traffic jams and riding between rows, the motorcycle seemed clumsy and had poor braking - the large mass and dimensions made themselves felt, and even more so the “energetic” character of the engine - when the engine continued to “pull” even when the gas was closed. But all this was only at the beginning, now I understand that both during maneuvers “between the rows” and on winding forest paths, there is more benefit from the smooth, “steamy” traction already at idle than from the “agility and torque” of high-speed engines. And besides, despite the high acceleration dynamics, during everyday city driving the motorcycle does not provoke “burning out” or “misbehavior”; even just moving in traffic you feel calm and “solid”, because of the confidence that, if necessary, you can how to dashingly jump onto the curb and “let the black soil burn,” and “beautifully” seep into the aisles.

But the greatest potential of a motorcycle is revealed not in the city, but during everyday use, on long multi-day trips and “light” off-road rides. The ergonomics of the XR are almost the same as on the 250cc endurance bikes, the same “direct” landing, quite loose as on Doubel and KLX, and not “butt-to-tail” as on the “smaller brother” - XR250 , and thanks to the larger width, wide, By enduro standards, the saddle is much more suitable for long and long trips.

The chassis on the XR650L is inherited from the Dakar participant and winner of all sorts of Rally-Bachs - the XR600, and does not cause any complaints. And what a thrill it is to rush “for a hundred” along a wide and straight dirt road somewhere in the Tver province - standing on the steps and peering into the distance of the road... you just need to try to avoid especially large stones and holes - after such rally rides the front wheel began to resemble a figure eight - oval, I had to take the wheel to the “extractor”.

When driving in difficult conditions, in mud, in snowdrifts, in “shit and poop” - the XR reveals its strengths and weaknesses - the high-torque power of the engine allows you to calmly, like a tractor, drive through mud, puddles, climb slopes and leisurely taxi along winding paths, it is also relatively easy to “jump over” logs - just unload the front and load the rear by “flopping” on the seat and at the same time “give gas” and then still have time to stand up on the pegs... Disadvantages of the motorcycle such as being an order of magnitude larger compared to the “checks” "Weight, high saddle height and dimensions also manifest themselves "in the rough" and on difficult terrain - just drop/lift the bike a couple of times while standing on a slippery slope or in a clay puddle, when the soil under the motorcycle boots moves away, and now you are almost "without strength." However, this is a matter of habit; after a year I got used to it and lifting it on a slope is no longer difficult and pulling it out of a hole/puddle by the trunk is no problem.

90% of my XR's mileage is on roads, most often asphalt, although I prefer dirt roads and forest/field roads. Based on this, I choose summer tires suitable as “50/50” - currently I have Mitas E-09 in the rear and Dunlop D-605 in the front. The tires will last for another couple of months; in the future I want to try the Pirelli MT-21 “rally raid”. Over the past year, I “demolished” the Uralshina in the rear and a little Dunlop D-604 in the front. In winter I used petroshins studded with autospikes - “five” in the rear, Kendu 760 Trackmaster and IRC m1a in the front.

During operation, I changed the oil and oil filters five times, the oil in the fork is now 5W, brake fluid, air filter, pads front and rear, chain twice, sprockets - drive twice, driven once (there are two sets - summer/speed and winter/traction ), well, burnt-out light bulbs and broken turn signals don’t count... There was one serious repair - with replacing the piston, halving the engine, putting the valves in order, etc. The cylinder is bored to the first repair size, it has a “tuned” Wiseco piston. Mileage after repair - 6t.km, incl. in winter. Everything is in order.

Honda XR650L. I will say this as the owner, and already a more or less “experienced” user of this unit. The motorcycle is excellent and universal, but only for those “who need it” and more or less experienced ones. For me, this is the third moto after Jobrik and Jebel, and I have ridden most other 250-400cc enduros, so in comparison I mean other 250-650cc enduros.

Pros.

1. Power and especially torque. (43 hp and 51 Nm at 5000 rpm) for comparison, the torque value of the XR650L is almost twice as high as that of the XR250 , and at 5000 rpm. against 7000rpm at the checkbox. Conclusion - tractor! In practice, the engine's thrust is such that it easily allows movement at idle, incl. on off-road, you only need to open the gas slightly at the start. Because of this, all kinds of climbs/slides, even “extremely” steep ones, can be driven with ease, at medium speeds.

2. Comfortable speed on the highway is 120-140 km/h, depending more on the presence/absence of a windshield and the appropriate equipment. Maximum speed is 145-160 km/h, depending on the stars and tires.

3. More stable due to greater weight and long base, somewhat more comfortable than chekushki. The ergonomics are classic, the seat is somewhat wider than that of endurics 250-400cc. The power reserve makes the ride more confident.

4. The motorcycle is reliable and unpretentious. Oil change after 3500-5000km, check/adjustment after 5-7t.km (done in 10-15 minutes in field conditions), the rear suspension has an oiler press, which makes maintenance easier.

Minuses.

1. The motorcycle is heavy (dry 147 kg, 162 kg equipped) in comparison with soft enduro 250cc and hard enduro 400-650cc. But much lighter than any enduro-tourist. This way it goes everywhere where smaller and lighter brothers go, but if it falls or gets stuck, it will require much more physical effort.

2. The dimensions, although slightly higher than those of the “smaller brothers”, and if the length/width does not cause any difficulties, the higher seat height (990mm) requires more experience and skill from the pilot.

3. A small standard tank (11.5 l), with a fuel consumption of 5-6.5 l per 100 km, is not enough. A tuned plastic one is just asking for it (for 17-21 liters, for long-distance driving), but with such a gas tank (full) you won’t envy lifting the bike - the weight of the bike will be about 170 kg, it will be hard.

Consider the positives and don't be too scared by the negatives. For experienced 250-400cc enduro pilots, controlling/handling it will not be difficult - everything is the same, it’s just that the bike is a little heavier, but more powerful and much more torquey. It will be difficult for beginners - due to the greater height of the saddle and greater mass. Personally, I'm still delighted with the XR650L, it's a tough, trouble-free bike. I drive it every day (almost every day) to work/on business, occasionally go on mini-long trips (200-500 km), ride on the roads with non-endurist friends and go off-road with endurist friends. I also drive it in winter. I even take part in competitions - at the endurocross on May 8 in Dmitrov I took an honorable 13th place, although I was thoroughly tired, but I really could have come closer to the favorites - the moto’s capabilities allow it. All in all, a truly versatile, unique motorcycle. Motorcycle friend!

But this is just my IMHO, although many of my endurist friends share it, it is necessary to take into account that the purchase of this motorcycle will be justified only with similar, universal use. If you need a motorcycle mainly for off-road use, then look for something lighter/smaller, but if you don’t plan to climb into shit at all, then it’s better to look at a tourist all-terrain vehicle, but if you really need ONE, universal motorcycle, both for “every day” and for long-distance driving, and “get rowdy in poop” - then the XR650L is still almost out of competition. Apparently this is why there is a stable demand for it and the motorcycle has been produced from 1993 to this day almost without changes, 17 years on the assembly line! that in itself says a lot.

In its class, it competes with the Suzuki DR650 SE and Kawasaki KLR650 C and KLX650 , but does not lose to them in any way, and in terms of reliability, unpretentiousness, ease of maintenance and strength, the chassis also has a head start. There is so far only one motorcycle that is seriously “better” than the XR650L - this is the KTM690 , even more powerful and high-torque but at the same time lighter and with impeccable handling. But the KTM is much more expensive, more demanding to maintain, and is still quite rare among “mere mortal” endurists. Also, the competition is Suzuki DR-Z400C , the purpose of the motorcycles is identical, and although the Suzuki is less high-torque, it is almost as powerful and ten kilograms lighter.

Honda XR650L . Good day everyone. My acquaintance with motorcycles began with the Kawasaki ZZR 400 . I got it for a thousand dollars with a removed rear caliper with holes in the carburetor membranes. Without docks and with broken plastic. I didn’t know how to ride))) but I fell in love with the bike.

During the season I drove about 30 thousand without docks and licenses. At that time I was about 30 years old. I sold it because there was a financial crisis. The second bike was a Honda Magna 750 chopper. But it wasn’t mine.

I sold it and took the monster Ducati 900ie. It didn't go down well either. I stood there almost the entire time. And then somehow fate brought me to Africa, I rented a 200cc endurik and amba))). I've been looking for you for so long. Endurik 200 cc in total and Everest enjoyed it.

But the weight in me under 100 and 200 cubes is clearly not enough for me))) I chose between 400 and 650. Now the Gods of two wheels are smiling at me again. I currently own an XR650l motor. I picked it up from a showroom in Moscow in the spring.

I can compare the first impressions of the transfer to Voronezh. compared to the Ducati Monster 900. My back hurt after 200 km on the monster and I barely made it to Voronezh. Xr actually carried me the same distance on the sofa)))) I didn’t feel tired.

I walked along Volgogradka from Moscow on broken asphalt, walked 100 where the cars were 40))) and this is not extreme for the suspension of a moto, but just a small thing.

Consumption 5.3 per hundred, original tank 10 is a minus. The speed of the cruiser on the highway is 100-110 and not because it can’t anymore, it’s just not comfortable without wind protection. Yes, it’s faster for me and it’s stressful to drive, I can’t see the beauty))) From 100 to 130, acceleration is easy enough for overtaking. Yes, this is not a sport bike, but it brought me so much pleasure))). Outwardly, the spendthrift is ugly (((a kind of little hunchbacked horse. But as much as he is not cute, he is just as much and even more comfortable and friendly.

I write all its “disadvantages” in quotation marks because this moto is a universal preparation for your desires. Easy to fix - the tank is set to 22 litas, the seat is touring, the light is from a jebel, the trunk is from Wright Moto. And the tourist is ready))), he took everything off into the forest fields along the gullies and the engine and suspension easily allow this. The brakes are a bit weak for the city, but not critical. If you don’t burn 150%, then it’s quite enough.

This AK-47 motorcycle is easy to repair. I REALLY liked the motorcycle, I wish you to find your motorcycle. And it doesn’t matter whether it’s chopper, sport or enduro. Ride, have fun, help each other. See you on the roads. Thanks to all.

Go to motorcycle Honda XR 650 (XR650L, XR650R)

Check out the test drives:

  • Honda XR650R: test drive
Rating
( 1 rating, average 5 out of 5 )
Did you like the article? Share with friends:
For any suggestions regarding the site: [email protected]
Для любых предложений по сайту: [email protected]